It seems like there might have been a typographical error or misunderstanding in this phrase. If you meant to refer to a specific term or error related to a coding concept, please clarify. If you’re referring to something like a “tone error” in communication or a “first-time error” in programming, here are some potential interpretations:
- Tone Error in Writing or Speech: In communication, a “tone error” may occur when the tone of a message (whether written or spoken) is not aligned with the intended meaning or audience expectations. For example, if you’re writing an article meant to be professional but the tone comes across as too casual or sarcastic, that could be called a tone error.
- First-Time Error in Programming: In software development, a “first-time error” could refer to an issue that occurs when code is executed for the first time, often because of incorrect setup or missing initialization.
Problem Statement
Given a set of distinct positive integers, you need to find the largest subset such that every pair (i, j)
in the subset satisfies:
i % j == 0
(i is divisible by j), or equivalently,j % i == 0
.
Your task is to return the largest subset from the given set of integers.
Example 1:
codeInput: [1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 9, 12, 18]
Output: [1, 2, 4, 8] # This is the largest subset
Example 2:
codeInput: [1, 2, 4, 8]
Output: [1, 2, 4, 8] # This is the largest subset
Approach to Solve the Problem
This problem can be solved using a dynamic programming approach, which essentially involves:
- Sorting the input array to make sure that we can check divisibility between the numbers in order (small to large).
- Using dynamic programming to store the longest divisible subset for each number in the array.
- Tracking the sequence of elements that can form the largest subset.
Let’s break down the approach into manageable steps:
Steps to Solve
- Sort the Input Array: Sorting helps because if a number
a[i]
can be divisible by a numbera[j]
, theni > j
. This property allows us to check divisibility in a linear fashion after sorting. - Define Dynamic Programming State: Let
dp[i]
represent the size of the largest divisible subset that ends with the elementa[i]
. - Track the Predecessors: We also need to keep track of the indices of previous elements in the subset. For each element
a[i]
, we will check all previous elementsa[j]
(j < i
) and see ifa[i] % a[j] == 0
. If true, we can extend the subset ending ata[j]
to includea[i]
. - Reconstruct the Largest Subset: Once we find the largest subset length, we will reconstruct the subset by tracing back the predecessors.
Code Implementation
codedef largestDivisibleSubset(nums):
if not nums:
return []
# Step 1: Sort the numbers in ascending order
nums.sort()
# Step 2: Initialize DP array and predecessor array
n = len(nums)
dp = [1] * n # dp[i] will store the length of the largest subset ending at nums[i]
prev = [-1] * n # prev[i] will store the previous index for the subset
# Step 3: Build the DP table
max_len = 1 # The length of the largest divisible subset
max_idx = 0 # The index of the last element in the largest subset
for i in range(1, n):
for j in range(i):
if nums[i] % nums[j] == 0:
# If nums[i] can be added to the subset ending at nums[j]
if dp[i] < dp[j] + 1:
dp[i] = dp[j] + 1
prev[i] = j
# Update the largest subset length if needed
if dp[i] > max_len:
max_len = dp[i]
max_idx = i
# Step 4: Reconstruct the largest divisible subset
subset = []
while max_idx != -1:
subset.append(nums[max_idx])
max_idx = prev[max_idx]
return subset[::-1] # Reverse the subset to get it in correct order
Explanation of the Code
- Sorting: We start by sorting the
nums
array to make sure we can easily check divisibility in an increasing order. - DP and Predecessor Array:
dp[i]
stores the length of the largest divisible subset ending atnums[i]
.prev[i]
helps us track the previous index in the subset so we can later reconstruct it.
- Double Loop for DP Calculation: The outer loop (
i
) checks each element in the array, and the inner loop (j
) compares it with previous elements (nums[j]
forj < i
). Ifnums[i] % nums[j] == 0
, it means we can addnums[i]
to the subset that ends atnums[j]
, and we updatedp[i]
accordingly. - Track the Largest Subset: We update
max_len
andmax_idx
whenever we find a new largest subset. Themax_idx
stores the index of the last element in the largest subset. - Reconstruction of the Subset: After building the DP array, we reconstruct the largest subset by tracing back from
max_idx
using theprev
array. - Return Result: Finally, we return the reconstructed subset after reversing it because we constructed it backwards.
Time Complexity
- Sorting: The sorting operation takes O(nlogn)O(n \log n)O(nlogn), where nnn is the length of the input array.
- Dynamic Programming: The nested loops iterate over the array, so the DP step takes O(n2)O(n^2)O(n2) time.
- Total Complexity: Therefore, the overall time complexity is O(n2)O(n^2)O(n2).
Space Complexity
- We use two additional arrays (
dp
andprev
) of size nnn, so the space complexity is O(n)O(n)O(n).
Walkthrough
Let’s walk through an example with the input:
codeInput: [1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 9, 12, 18]
- Sort the array:
[1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 9, 12, 18]
- Initialize
dp
andprev
arrays:dp = [1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1]
prev = [-1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1]
- Fill the
dp
andprev
arrays: After processing all pairs, the largest divisible subset will have a size of 4 (ending at index 7, corresponding to[1, 2, 4, 8]
). - Reconstruct the subset: By following the
prev
pointers, we get the subset[1, 2, 4, 8]
.
Conclusion
The dynamic programming solution for the Largest Divisible Subset problem ensures an optimal solution with a time complexity of O(n2)O(n^2)O(n2) and space complexity of O(n)O(n)O(n). By leveraging sorting, dynamic programming, and predecessor tracking, we can efficiently find the largest subset where every pair of numbers divides each other.